ArcGIS Solutions

Preparing for Lead and Copper Rule Improvements

In November of 2023, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) released proposed improvements to the Lead and Copper Rule. These improvements are intended to strengthen the Lead and Copper Rule Revisions (LCRR), adding substantial requirements for water systems.

 

What’s Being Proposed?

The USEPA is proposing revisions to the National Primary Drinking Water Regulation for lead and copper under the authority of the Safe Drinking Water Act. These proposed Lead and Copper Rule Improvements (LCRI) build on the 2021 LCRR and the original 1991 Lead and Copper Rule (LCR). Feedback gathered during stakeholder and public review of the LCRR was used to shape the proposed LCRI. The proposed rule includes significant changes that will have a massive impact on water system resources.

The proposed LCRI are described in a 213-page document provided by the USEPA (National Primary Drinking Water Regulations for Lead and Copper: Improvements). The General Information section of this document identifies six key revisions.

The USEPA is Proposing:

Mandatory Full-Service Line Replacement

Water systems would be required to replace lead service lines and galvanized service lines that are downstream, or at one time were downstream, of a lead service line or a service line of unknown material. Service line replacements would need to be completed within 10 years. Lead connectors would also need to be replaced.

The mandatory service line replacement would include small system compliance, regardless of their 90th percentile lead level. In addition, the community water systems flexibility threshold would change to those serving 3,300 or fewer people.

Development of a Service Line Replacement Plan

Any water provider that has unknown service line material or has identified lead service lines and galvanized requiring replacement service lines within their system must prepare a service line replacement plan. The plan must ensure that lead is replaced within the 10-year timeframe and that the replacements are done equitably.

A Lower Lead Action Level

The proposed LCRI would lower the lead action level from 0.015 mg/L to 0.010 mg/L. The lower action level will increase corrosion control efforts and extend public education. Systems that exceed the lead action level three or more times in a five-year period would be required to take additional actions to provide public education and make filters available to those impacted.

Updated Tap Sampling Protocol

The tap sampling protocol proposed in the LCRI changes how water systems calculate their 90th percentile where lead service lines are identified. Water systems would be required to use the higher value of the first or fifth liter. 

Water Quality Parameters for Medium Systems

States are being asked to set optimal water quality parameters for systems with corrosion control. Systems serving between 10,000 and 50,000 people will be required to demonstrate that they are maintaining optimal corrosion control treatment. If a system is triggered into corrosion control treatment and can replace all lead in the system within five years, the treatment or re-optimized treatment can be deferred.

Updated Public Education Requirements

The EPA is proposing new public education requirements for lead and copper. Water systems will need to create more proactive messaging and increase educational content. The goal of these changes is to better inform the public about the impacts of lead in drinking water.

How Are Water Systems Preparing?

Water service providers have been working to meet the Lead and Copper Rule Revisions deadline of October 2024. This work is preparing them for what is to come.

The LCRR include the following:

Water service providers are building their service line inventory, identifying where lead has been found, and creating a replacement plan. In some cases, utilities have already completed lead service line replacement. Doing this work, in addition to ensuring the delivery of safe drinking water, has been challenging.

Many utilities have implemented new technology, grown existing technology, and partnered with industry experts to help them meet the LCRR 2024 deadline. Although we are not sure what will be included in the final LCRI, the water industry is actively preparing.

Greater Johnstown Water Autority

Greater Johnstown Water Authority (GJWA) implemented user-friendly, easy-to-use applications to support the creation of a service line inventory. Staff are using mobile applications to view a system map, access tap card information, and collect or confirm data. This has enabled GJWA to improve communications with contractors and quickly identify pipe material as locator services are completed. Web maps are being used for a multitude of water authority tasks, from improved asset locating, customer support, and project and budget planning to coordinating projects with other entities to reduce restoration costs and inconveniences to the public. Dashboards are being used to help manage verification of service line materials. Modern, web-based mapping technology has enabled GJWA to quickly prepare to meet regulatory requirements while also improving workflow efficiency and saving money.

Service lines mapped and shown in ArcGIS Pro and GJWA’s mobile viewer, including the attached tap card records. Click on the image to learn more about the work GJWA has done to meet LCRR requirements.
Service lines mapped and shown in ArcGIS Pro and GJWA’s mobile viewer, including the attached tap card records. Click on the image to learn more about the work GJWA has done to meet LCRR requirements.

Santa Margarita Water District

Santa Margarita Water District deployed Esri’s Lead Service Line Inventory solution from ArcGIS Solutions, which provided a comprehensive array of capabilities, including the establishment of a service line inventory database, integration with various data sources, development of field applications for data collection, creation of progress monitoring dashboards, and formulation of templates for public-facing resources. Staff was able to not only fulfill Lead and Copper Rule inspection obligations, but also gather and validate service line data and meter asset information for its internal data integrity initiatives.

The utilization of the Esri solution ensured that this project not only met regulatory standards, but showed the transformative impact of leveraging advanced GIS technology for complex challenges.

Daniel Peterson Regulatory and Logistics Manager, Santa Margarita Water District
SMWD staff use this dashboard to view and report service line statistics. Click on the image to learn more about their utilization of ArcGIS technology to prepare for the LCRR deadline.
SMWD staff use this dashboard to view and report service line statistics. Click on the image to learn more about their utilization of ArcGIS technology to prepare for the LCRR deadline.

Ready to Face the Future

The work being done by utilities across the nation is preparing them for what’s to come. We don’t know exactly what will be included in the final LCRI, but the proposed improvements give us a place to start. Utilities with authoritative information about their systems assets, the ability to analyze and understand this information, and solutions in place to support the work that needs to be done are going to successfully navigate improvements to the Lead and Copper Rule.

Learn more about Mapping and Analytics for Lead and Copper Rule Compliance

Contact the Esri water team: EsriWater@esri.com

About the author

Christa is an experienced water industry professional with 20 years of success using and promoting technology to solve problems in the water industry. Recognized for Industry thought leadership, strategic thinking, and building success with organizations across the globe. She is a passionate GIS advocate, lifelong learner and collaborator. Builds success jointly with teammates, peers, and customers. Christa is a certified GIS Professional and holds a graduate degree in Geography.

Connect:
Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Next Article

Try group filters in ArcGIS Experience Builder

Read this article